Friday, April 17, 2009
The reasoning in Arjun’s response is flawed
Q14= Arjun brings up 1 specific POSSIBLE case where computer crime leads 2 physical harm, but his example hasn't actually happened. C.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About
I'm a professional LSAT tutor, and I post LSAT explanations on Twitter every weekday. Follow me there, and check out LSAT Blog for more tips!
-Steve Schwartz
(in-person, phone, and online tutoring available)
-Steve Schwartz
(in-person, phone, and online tutoring available)
No comments:
Post a Comment