June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 20

Q20= Gamba argues # of votes (sample size) opposing water system is too small to be representative of majority of public opinion. E #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 19

LSAT PrepTest PDFs



LSAT Study Schedules



LSAT Cheat Sheets



Logic Games



Logical Reasoning



Reading Comprehension



Admissions







PrepTests



Schedules



Cheat Sheets



Logic Games



Logical Reasoning



Reading Comprehension



Admissions





Q19=urban groups irrelevant to the argument. choices BCDE all help strengthen the argument, but choice A about urban groups has no effect. A

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 18

Q18=If researchers have big incentive 2disprove hypotheses & if many work for new clim findings, expect them to try disprove global warm. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 17

Q17=computer experts not qualified to talk about institutions' biggest threats. as far as we know, their expertise is limited to comps. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 16

Q16=ppl must explicitly disagree on point at issue. T&S express opposing opinions on science yielding precise math results being suspect. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 15

Q15=only necessary to vaccinate every year IF new strain of flu every year. if same flu strain 2 yrs in a row, no need to vaccinate again. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 14

Q14= 2 weaken the argument, we need evidence suggesting heat is cause of enzyme destruction. if microwaves -> hot zones, heat's the cause. E

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 13

Q13=M only contains 2x as many cans as L if didn't lose some aluminum in the process. arg assumes recycling is perfectly efficient. C #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 12

Q12=take stimulus in abstract terms: stimulus says if you can't do 2 things at once, you have no obligation to do always do either 1.A #LSAT

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 11

Q11=arg makes analogy between 1 unfounded complaint & another. thus, arg suggests electronic media not necessarily harmful 2 human mind. C

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 10

Q10= rephrase: b/c double-blind techniques prevent neg conseq (evidence) -> sci should use them (conclusion). arg leads to recommendation. B

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 9

Q9=Arg=Sales will decline b/c 13-16yo group decreasing in size. However, arg ignores possibility another age group will buy games instead. E

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 8

Q8=Evidence:Electric cars ONLY powered by river dams, nuclear plants, or coal plants. Conclusion: electric cars will cause enviro damage. A

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 7

Q7=If advanced -> abstract principles. If adv->NOT self-interest & NOT societal norms & conventions. Jadine acts from abstract principles. D

June 2007 LSAT, Section 2, Question 6

Q6= app->ugrad. Felon->~app.Contra=app->~felon. Thus,app -> ugrad& ~felony. Cnclsn=Felon&ugrad->~ ExecAd.Thus,qualify ExAd->qualify ExBrd. B